According To Numerous Ancient Accounts, There Was A Time When The Moon Did Not Exist In The Sky
In old writings as well as traditions one can discover proof of a time when the moon did not exist. Democretus and also Anaxagoras discuss that there was a time when no moon could be seen in the night skies. In describing the background of the Greek area of Arcadia, Aristotle composes that the Pelasgians resided in the location since very old times; each time when the moon did not exist.
Apollonios from Rhodes discusses something similar; he talks about a time when not every one of the celestial objects existed overhead; prior to the time of Deucalion’s and also Pyrra’s generation (before the calamity); when the moon did not exist as well as the only people that existed were the Pelasgians surviving the hills of Arcadia (region in Greece). These citizens of Arcadia where likewise referred to as Proselenes (implying “those that were before moon” in Greek).
In Plutarch’s job “Precepts” we locate the following: “There were Arcadians of Evander’s following, the supposed pre-Lunar people.”
In a similar way, Ovid created: “The Arcadians are stated to have possessed their land before the birth of Zeus, and also the folk is older than the Moon.”
Stephanus of Byzantium wrote: “Arcadians and also ladies, both exist prior to the moon”. Hippolytus refers to a tale that “Arcadia produced Pelasgus, of better classical times than the moon.”
Lukianos in his Astrology claims that “the Arcadians verify in their recklessness that they are older than the moon”.
Proof has actually also been found in various other parts of the world. In Bolivia icons on the wall of the yard of Kalasasaya (built in 13,000 BC) supply proof that the moon came into orbit around the Earth at a certain moment in time hundreds of years ago, long before what mainstream historians describe as recorded background. Moreover the schedule gate in the very same site supplies proof that a smaller satellite when revolved around the Earth.
The oral traditions of Colombian Indians of the Bogota highlands in the eastern Corldilleras of Colombia refer to a time before the moon.
” In the earliest times, when the moon was not yet in the paradises,” say the tribesmen of Chibchas (1 ).
Africa also offers its very own evidence. According to Zulu legend, the moon was brought hundreds of generations ago by 2 siblings of alien form, Wowane as well as Mpanku.
What does all this mean?
The ancient memory of a Planet lived in by humans without a moon has passed from generations to generations creating the customs of many civilizations. Just how did the moon get there?
Referral: 1. A. von Humboldt, Vues des Cordilléres (1816 ), English transl.: Researches Concerning the Establishments as well as Monoliths of the Old Citizens of America, (1814 ), vol. I, p. 87; cf. H. Fischer, In mondener Welt (1930 ), p. 145
Resource: HistoryDisclosure.com
The Planet Without The Moon
The period when the Planet was Moonless is most likely the most remote recollection of humanity. Democritus and also Anaxagoras showed that there was a time when the Planet lacked the Moon.( 1) Aristotle composed that Arcadia in Greece, prior to being populated by the Hellenes, had a population of Pelasgians, and that these natives inhabited the land currently before there was a moon overhead over the Planet; therefore they were called Proselenes.( 2 )
Apollonius of Rhodes stated the time “when not all the orbs were yet in the heavens, before the Danai and also Deukalion races began, and also just the Arcadians lived, of whom it is claimed that they dwelt on hills as well as preyed on acorns, before there was a moon.” (3 )
Plutarch wrote in The Roman Concerns: “There were Arcadians of Evander’s complying with, the so-called pre-Lunar individuals.”( 4) Similarly composed Ovid: “The Arcadians are said to have possessed their land prior to the birth of Jove, and the individual is older than the Moon.” (5) Hippolytus describes a tale that “Arcadia brought forth Pelasgus, of greater classical times than the moon.”( 6) Lucian in his Astrology claims that “the Arcadians attest in their folly that they are older than the moon.”( 7 )
Censorinus additionally mentions the time in the past when there was no moon in the sky.( 8 )
Some insinuations to the moment prior to there was a Moon might be found additionally in the Scriptures. In Work 25:5 the majesty of the Lord who “Makes peace in the elevations” is praised as well as the time is stated “prior to [there was] a moon and it did not beam.” Also in Psalm 72:5 it is stated: “Thou wast been afraid because [the time of] the sun and before [the moment of] the moon, a generation of generations.” A “generation of generations” means a very long time. Certainly, it is useless to counter this psalm with the myth of the initial phase of Genesis, a tale brought down from exotic and later resources.
The memory of a world without a moon stays in dental practice among the Indians. The Indians of the Bogota highlands in the eastern Cordilleras of Colombia relate several of their tribal reminiscences to the moment before there was a moon. “In the earliest times, when the moon was not yet in the heavens,” state the tribesmen of Chibchas.( 9 )
There are presently three concepts of the origin of the moon:
1) The Moon came from at the same time as the Planet, being formed significantly from the very same product, accumulating and solidifying.
2) The Moon was formed not in the vicinity of the Earth, however in a various part of the solar system, and was later captured by the Earth.
3) The Moon was originally a part of the terrestrial crust and was torn out, leaving behind the bed of the Pacific.
All 3 theories claim the visibility of the Moon on an orbit around the Planet for billions of years. Folklore may supply each of these views with some assistance (Genesis I for the first view; the birth of Aphrodite from the sea for the 3rd view; Aphrodite’s origin in the disturbance of Uranus, as well as also the physical violence of Sin– the Babylonian Moon– seems to support the 2nd view).
Because mankind on both sides of the Atlantic maintained the memory of a time when the Earth was without the Moon, the initial hypothesis, namely, of the Moon originating concurrently with the Earth as well as in its vicinity, is to be excluded, leaving the various other two theories to complete in between themselves.
We have actually seen that the traditions of varied individuals provide corroborative testimony to the result that in a very early age, however still in the memory of mankind, no moon came with the Planet.( 10) Because people already peopled the Earth, it is improbable that the Moon derived from it: there need to have existed a solid lithosphere, not a liquid earth. Hence while I do not declare to recognize the beginning of the Moon, I locate it a lot more potential that the Moon was captured by the Planet. Such an occasion would have happened as a catastrophe.( 11) If the Moon’s formation happened far from the Earth,( 12) its structure might be quite different.
There is no proof to suggest whether the Moon was an earth, a satellite of another earth, or a comet at the time of its capture by the Planet. Whatever ambience it might have had( 13) was retreated by the Earth, by other getting in touch with bodies, or dissipated in some other way.
Considering that the time the Moon began to accompany the Planet, it underwent the influence of contacts with comets and also worlds that passed near the Planet in succeeding ages. The mass of the Moon being less than that of the Earth, the Moon has to have endured better disturbances in planetary get in touches with. During these get in touches with the Moon was not carried away: this is due to the fact that no body more effective than the Earth came sufficiently near the Moon to take it away from the Planet for good; but in the contacts that occurred the Moon was removed consistently from one orbit to another.
The variants in the position of the Moon can be checked out in the variants in the size of the month. The size of the month repetitively altered in subseqent disastrous occasions– and for this there exists a big quantity of sustaining evidence. In these later occurrences the Moon played a passive role, and Zeus in the Iliad advised it (Aphrodite) to avoid of the fight in which Athene and Ares (Venus and Mars) were the major candidates.
Recommendations:
Hippolytus, Refutatio Omnium Haeresium V. ii.
Aristotle, fr. 591 (ed. V. Rose [Teubner: Tuebingen, 1886]. Cf. Pauly’s Realencyclopaedie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, post “Mond”; H. Roscher, Vocabulary d. griech. und roemisch. Mythologie, short article “Proselenes.”.
Argonautica IV.264.
Plutarch, Moralia, transl. by F. C. Babbit, sect. 76.
Fasti, transl. by Sir J. Frazer, II. 290.
Refutatio Omnium Haeresium V. ii.
Lucian, Astrology, transl. by A. M. Harmon (1936 ), p. 367, the same level. 26.
Liber de pass away natali 19; additionally scholium on Aristophanes’ Clouds, line 398.
A. von Humboldt, Vues des Cordillères (1816 ), English transl.: Researches Concerning the Organizations as well as Monuments of the Old Citizens of America, (1814 ), vol. I, p. 87; cf. H. Fischer, In mondener Welt (1930 ), p. 145.